Skip to main content

Star Wars Standalone Movies: Keeping The Mystery

With rumours that Disney/Lucasfilm is planning on making Star Wars movies based on characters such as Han Solo, Boba Fett and Yoda, the internet is positively busting at the thought of these new movies. While my first reaction upon hearing about more Star Wars movies was “More Star Wars? Yes, please” I’ve now had time to think about what these new movies could mean to the Saga.

The original Star Wars relied heavily on archetypal characters in order to convey to the audience the heroes’ journey that Luke Skywalker takes. He’s an innocent farmboy. Ben Kenobi, the Merlin-like teacher. Darth Vader, the black garbed villain. Han Solo’s character is there to be a cynical foil to Luke’s naivety. In the sequels we meet Yoda, the wise old sage and Boba Fett, gunslinger for hire. Each character serves a purpose based on the archetype they represent.

We are to assume based on our introduction to Han in Star Wars that since he’s just shot Greedo (first!) he’s a no-nonsense, possibly dangerous character. When he meets Luke and Ben we also find out he’s a mercenary, only looking out for himself. Rescuing Princess Leia from the Death Star was, if you could have asked Han at the time, a means to an end:" I’m not getting off of this battle station and therefore saving my own skin, unless I help these people out." Once on Yavin 4, he collects his reward and leaves. Nothing very heroic there, is there? It’s not until after he returns at the climax of the movie and takes out Darth Vader in the Death Star trench do we see a transformation in his character, now instead of looking out for himself, he’s become a hero by thinking of others.

So, what does this have to do with new Star Wars movies? Well, if these movies do in fact feature Han in a stand alone story, are we going to see him post Episode IV or before? It’s an important distinction because if we see him in a time frame before the original Star Wars, he should be a callous, selfish character thinking of no one but himself. A far less interesting story than the one we follow beginning with Episode IV and ending with Return of the Jedi where we see Han develop into a hero. There have been Expanded Universe stories that have dealt with Han’s past that show him as a hero. This is a mistake because we are to assume that until that fateful moment in the Mos Eisley cantina, Han Solo was nothing more than a rogue. There have been Expanded Universe stories that have dealt with Han before Episode IV and to me these stories ring hollow because they are showing a character who for the most part has already become the hero he is supposed to become later on.

If we do see a Han Solo movie in the coming years, I would hope that it takes place after the events of Episode IV, preferably between IV and V when Han would still be wrestling with his decision to join the Rebel Alliance.

The idea of a Yoda stand alone movie is also, in my opinion, not a good idea. A huge part of what makes up Yoda’s character is the fact that he is 900 years old and therefore carries 900 years of history--and mystery. This is basically what makes Yoda so interesting. We have no idea of where he's from and what he's experienced. The "Darkside Cave" in Empire Strikes Back obviously has a story behind it. I like to think it perhaps represents Yoda's own struggle with the darkside, maybe through an unknown darkside user but I like to think that Yoda is from Dagobah and over the course of 900 years he returns to it numerous times and that the cave is a physical representation of his dark side battles. Again, not knowing is what makes this interesting. Did Yoda actually cross over to the darkside? Possibly but all I need to see is this ancient, wrinkled little alien and the wisdom and sadness in his eyes over 5 different movies. I don't need it spelled out for me.

Better to have a stage with dark spaces that allows the audience to fill in the details for themselves.

While I welcome new Star Wars films, my hope is that the creators look at new characters and situations. The Original Trilogy provided my generation with the stories of Han, Luke and Leia. The Prequels provided another generation with a new set-Anakin and Obi-Wan. It would be great to see the next generation of Star Wars fans have their own heroes.

Mike Macdonald
Looking Away To The Horizon



Popular posts from this blog

Did Paul Freeman Accidentally Eat A Fly In Raiders of the Lost Ark?

The Famous Indiana Jones Fly In Belloq's Mouth Scene.  Did It Really Happen? I've always wondered if Paul Freeman unintentionally consumed a fly in this scene in  Raiders of the Lost Ark ?  It's the scene where Indiana Jones shouts down to Bellosh...I mean Belloq and threatens to blow up the ark.  Did a fly go in his mouth? I remember watching this scene back in the early eighties and my ten year old mind thought he definitely had a snack while filming.  I recall talking about 'flygate' in my school playground at the time and the general consensus with my friends was that Freeman definitely had a sneaky snack. Paul Freeman talks about the famous 'fly' scene in an interview with  and settled 'flygate:' This is a bit of a dicey question so don’t get too upset. (Laughs) A movie’s always got bloopers in it, some have a lot, and some only have three or four. And the most remarkable blooper was right before the opening of th

Star Wars VII Movie Poster - Every End Is A New Beginning

Star Wars VII Movie Poster Just saw this Star Wars VII movie poster on Kyle Newman's Facebook fee d.  The poster is by  Lyndon Berresford and Paul Bateman.  I am loving this.  Who do you think the two characters are?  Lando and Leia?  Han and Leia's children? Have you seen other Star Wars VII movie posters?  Let me know. Rob Wainfur @welshslider

Explaining That "Weird" Cut In Poltergeist. Read The Missing Scene

Why Is There A Strange Cut In The 1982 Horror Classic, Poltergeist? If you're a fan of the 1982 Horror classic, Poltergeist then you will be very familiar with that "weird" cut in the movie.  It's 32 minutes and 47 seconds in to the movie and the scene is where Diane is explaining the strange phenomenon that is happening in the kitchen.  First, she shows to Steve a chair scraping across the floor all on its own then she does the same with Carol Anne.  Steve leans up against the kitchen wall and is completely shocked at what just happened.  It's at this point Diane starts to explain the sensation of being pulled and then...A very abrupt cut.  One moment we are listening to Diane and suddenly it cuts to Diane and Steve at their next door neighbours door.  Why the sudden cut?  It's on the VHS, DVD, Blu-Ray and even the streaming versions.  Why does this awful and weird cut exist in the movie, Poltergeist?  Watch the clip below to see the cut: Well, the ans