Skip to main content

Movie Review: Colin Trevorrow's "The Book of Henry" is Completely Involving if Not Completely Satisfying

THE BOOK OF HENRY
Starring Naomi Watts, Jaeden Lieberher, Jacob Tremblay, Sarah Silverman, Lee Pace, Maddie Ziegler and Dean Morris
Written By Greg Hurwitz
Directed by Colin Trevorrow

Reviewed by Patrick Gibbs & Paul Gibbs

 Out of Four


F
or his follow up to Jurassic World, director Colin Trevorrow has gone back to a smaller, more character oriented story, and his strong ability with actors and small dialogue scenes is on full display, but the slick Hollywood element is also at play here. The mixed result leaves only one definite conclusion: The Book of Henry is, for better or worse, a truly unique movie summer full of sequels and reboots.

Henry Carpenter (Jaeden Lieberher) is a 11-year genius living with his single mother and younger brother, Peter (Room's Jacob Tremblay). Henry is in many ways the head of the household, managing the family finances and trusted by his mother to make shrewd investments, and always looking out for his brother, until he distracted by a girl, Christina (Maddie Zeigler) who lives next door with her step-father (Dean Norris), the local police commissioner. Henry's intellect and keen powers of observation lead him to feel certain of what no one else wants to see: Christina is being abused by her step-father. Henry is determined to help the girl, but runs into several unexpected challenges, including a community that doesn't want to hear any accusations against a prominent citizen.

The film is very centered around twists and
The film is heavily built around twists and surprises, enough so that a spoiler free review requires staying a bit vague, and it mixes the family drama tearjerker with the Hitchcockian thriller. It's both ambitious and willing to sacrifice being a great drama for being a taut thriller, and doesn't fully succeed at either, but it's simply too involving to dismiss as completely failing. The terrific cast and strong direction make a script that is all over the place but highly watchable, and it's the kind of movie that leaves you very frustrated, wondering "Am I stupid if I liked this or stupid if I didn't?" It 's almost like early Shyamalan in drawing the viewer in to the point of easily going along with the more far fetched elements while watching it, dying to see how this ends, only to spend the rest of the night thinking about all of the bits that just don't add up.

The central performances from Watts and Lieberher really pull you in, and while nearly every character falls into a stock type, the individual actors approach them with enough thought and sincerity that you can't help but care about them. Perhaps the most extreme example of this is Sarah Silverman as Mom's friend Sheila, who fits every stereotype that generally applies to a woman named Sheila both in movies and real life (too much reliance of make-up, cleavage and alcohol) and has an ongoing insult war going on with Henry, who usually wins. This would have been a very easy character to overplay and make into an eye roller, but Silverman keeps her real and grounded and even provides one of the most touching moments in the film. Young Jacob Tremblay shows again that he is remarkably honest and natural actor who can powerfully portray emotion. But Leiberher in particular makes you feel that his performance should not be categorized as terrific performance from a child actor, but rather just a terrific performance from an actor,

It is unfortunate that contrivances and Hollywood machinations too often get in the way of the more sincere elements of the film, and even more unfortunate that it's simply impossible to completely dismiss the questionable taste factor of some key plot elements.  The Book of Henry is is too at odds with itself to make it easy to come to a definite conclusion as to its merit. The upside of this is that this movie will give you a lot more to talk and think about than most of what you see this summer, and we definitely found it to be emotionally stirring.  It is as interesting as it is flawed, and we found it impossible to completely dismiss or embrace.

Trevorrow remains a talented and exciting director, and while it is easy to see why this script got stuck in his head, and yet just as clear that there probably isn't a director out there that could have fully made it work. There are some on the internet freaking out over the bad reviews because Trevorrow is slated to direct Star Wars: Episode IX, but everyone needs to relax a little. This is an interesting movie that gets very wrong headed at times and ultimately just doesn't quite work. It's not a war crime. Doubterd need to watch Safety Not Guaranteed and just take deep breath, and focus on the fact that The Book of Henry shows that Trevorrow can handle suspense and emotion very well. He is still a great choice for Star Wars, and we can't wait to see what he does with it.


The Bearded Trio - The Site For Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, John Williams and a whole lot more.


THE BEARDED TRIO ON FACEBOOK
THE BEARDED TRIO ON TWITTER
THE BEARDED TRIO ON GOOGLE+
THE BEARDED TRIO ON PINTEREST

CLICK HERE FOR FACTS ON STEVEN SPIELBERG
CLICK HERE FOR FACTS ON GEORGE LUCAS
CLICK HERE FOR FACTS ON JOHN WILLIAMS

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Did Paul Freeman Accidentally Eat A Fly In Raiders of the Lost Ark?

The Famous Indiana Jones Fly In Belloq's Mouth Scene.  Did It Really Happen? I've always wondered if Paul Freeman unintentionally consumed a fly in this scene in  Raiders of the Lost Ark ?  It's the scene where Indiana Jones shouts down to Bellosh...I mean Belloq and threatens to blow up the ark.  Did a fly go in his mouth? I remember watching this scene back in the early eighties and my ten year old mind thought he definitely had a snack while filming.  I recall talking about 'flygate' in my school playground at the time and the general consensus with my friends was that Freeman definitely had a sneaky snack. Paul Freeman talks about the famous 'fly' scene in an interview with TheIndyExperience.com  and settled 'flygate:' This is a bit of a dicey question so don’t get too upset. (Laughs) A movie’s always got bloopers in it, some have a lot, and some only have three or four. And the most remarkable blooper was right before the opening of th

Star Wars VII Movie Poster - Every End Is A New Beginning

Star Wars VII Movie Poster Just saw this Star Wars VII movie poster on Kyle Newman's Facebook fee d.  The poster is by  Lyndon Berresford and Paul Bateman.  I am loving this.  Who do you think the two characters are?  Lando and Leia?  Han and Leia's children? Have you seen other Star Wars VII movie posters?  Let me know. Rob Wainfur @welshslider

Explaining That "Weird" Cut In Poltergeist. Read The Missing Scene

Why Is There A Strange Cut In The 1982 Horror Classic, Poltergeist? If you're a fan of the 1982 Horror classic, Poltergeist then you will be very familiar with that "weird" cut in the movie.  It's 32 minutes and 47 seconds in to the movie and the scene is where Diane is explaining the strange phenomenon that is happening in the kitchen.  First, she shows to Steve a chair scraping across the floor all on its own then she does the same with Carol Anne.  Steve leans up against the kitchen wall and is completely shocked at what just happened.  It's at this point Diane starts to explain the sensation of being pulled and then...A very abrupt cut.  One moment we are listening to Diane and suddenly it cuts to Diane and Steve at their next door neighbours door.  Why the sudden cut?  It's on the VHS, DVD, Blu-Ray and even the streaming versions.  Why does this awful and weird cut exist in the movie, Poltergeist?  Watch the clip below to see the cut: Well, the ans